![]() ![]() Only with the internal probe, the i1 has not yet been delivered. I have recalibrated just using the GPU and taking the Decklink out of the equation. I would also strongly suggest to go to Light Illusion web site and read the info there, especially the Historical Guides where there is a ton of information. Buying a i1D3 is only half the battle, it needs to be corrected with a spectro. There is also the option of paying a professional to calibrate your monitor Certainly, before I spent money on an i1D3 i would hire a calibrator with a high end spectro to correlate the internal probe if you intend to try and do it yourself. I have attached the CN7 target (REC709.zip) that I used to calibrate the CG319X I have here, just import it into CN7. If you are using Resolve with video levels then set the CG319X to limited Signal Out to In need to match. I would suggest as Steve has pointed out that you have a scaling issue in your signal path however, but it's highly unlikely it is a probe issue unless there is some fault (make sure there is no flare hitting the screen). I'm not sure why you have a low CR as the EIZO internal TPG takes away scaling errors. But that doesn't mean all or most i1d3's will be accurate for D65 for instance. It does match reasonably closely the edr I created with spectral data from the CR300 when I compare the modified edr in Colourspace with the standard RG edr with correction in CN7. When using the i1D3 CN7 does actually provide a correction based on testing against a CS2000 for the standard RG edr, which you can turn off in CN7 by deselecting Colour Management in preferences. The RG Phosphor Family 2012 SPD does not match the SPD of the EIZO displays and the variability of the probes means that you cannot know without using a high end instrument whether your probe is accurate or not. Certainly the spectral function is far better than a genereic matrix which doesn't work, but the variablity in the probes means that if you're looking for some dE00 of a very low number the chances are exactly that, a chance. I have three i1D3's and the short response is that if you do not correlate to a spectro then it's a lottery. I have also been doing work when I can for the other thread with the CS2731 which I hope to try and finish. Nearly all the orange dots were just a tad over the 1 that you can see if the 3D graph. I then correlated the Internal Probe to the CR300 in CN7 and recalibrated with CN7 and also the CR100 to the CR300 and ran a 1000 patch test with Colourspace so I had apples for apples (CN7 uses FCCM where CS use a volumetric matrix but lets call it equal for the test). This is what you would expect from a CG319X, maybe to 0.085 but really not more. So I used the CG319X and CN7 to calibrate to Rec709 with the internal probe. I can say that testing the Gamma Priority is that the Grey Balance mode lifts the blacks significantly, on a CG2420 black level went from 0.077nit to 0.11nit in a test I did the other day. The CG319X has the new series probe which is designed and made by EIZO with glass filters and not plastic like the OEM unit they had in older monitors. I have been playing (OK seriously testing) with the new series, CG319X, CG247X, CG2420 and CS2731. Also note that “report on current calibration” will report on whatever is currently in the videoLUT.I have no experience with previous ColorNavigator and older EIZO monitors. What instrument are you using? Failing to hit a specific target black level may indicate that the instrument isn’t precise enough to read that low (at least not consistently), or may indicate the display has some dynamic dimming or similar features enabled. So my attempt had failed miserably – the black level was not honoured. It is perfectly fine to raise the black level via the calibration curves (too) though, when it doesn’t matter that contrast is reduced system-wide, not just when softproofing. Does dark table honor the printer profile and use colorimetric intent for the softproof, so that paper white and inks are properly taken into account (these options may also be called “Simulate paper white” and “Simulate black ink”, or something along those lines, respectively)? Is the printer profile accurate? 300:1 seems excessive when it comes to print – even a high quality inkjet print on premium glossy paper should be less than 200:1 – but normally reducing contrast ratio for soft proofing is achieved by using appropriate and accurate ICC profiles. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |